NEWSFLASH Grading Rubric
Category |
Emerging |
Approaching |
Meeting |
Exceeding |
Content |
Many of the historical facts are either irrelevant or
inaccurate Information is confusing with no emphasis placed on
main points. NOT in your own words DoesnÕt mention Revolutions Doesn't use information from any unit |
Most historical
facts are relevant and accurate Some information is
confusing. Main points are not
clearly highlighted. Mentions one other
Revolution: American, French, Iranian, Cuban Uses 2-3 terms from units1-2 |
All historical facts are relevant and accurate. All information is conveyed clearly, emphasis placed
on main points. Compares Rev to one: American, French, Iranian, Cuban Uses 4 terms from Unit 1 or 2. |
Satisfies all the meeting criteria + Evidence of outside research
(works cited page required) Compares Rev to 2: American, French, Iranian, Cuban Uses a lot of information from both other units |
|
Historical
Perspective |
Demonstrates little awareness of contrasting view
points Does not use any supporting details to explain
perspective. |
Demonstrates awareness of contrasting view
points/perspectives Only one viewpoint has supporting details that help
to explain the perspective. |
Demonstrates awareness of contrasting view
points/perspectives Uses details to explain the two contrasting
viewpoints |
Satisfies all the meeting criteria + Explains how conflicting values lead to different perspectives |
|
Oral
Presentation |
Speech is mumbled or inaudible Actors forget lines Actors are Òout of characterÓ many times Unorganized and confusing presentation Òexpert debateÓ lacks any clear arguments |
Speech is either rushed, unenthusiastic, or slightly
inaudible Lines are not smoothly
recited Actors sometimes come out
of character Report asks some engaging
questions, but others are dull and boring Òexpert debateÓ is
balanced, but not filled with interesting details |
Speaks with clarity, enthusiasm, and confidence Lines are memorized Actors are Òin characterÓ Reporters ask engaging and important questions. ÒExpert debateÓ is balanced, thoughtful, and
professional |
Satisfies all the meeting criteria + Soundtrack or other special effects enhance
presentation Evidence of extra work that makes presentation come
alive and seem realistic. |
|
Visuals |
No characters are in costume No images behind the anchor No effort to decide setting and backdrop of scene No props or visuals used |
Only a few of characters
are in costume Some images behind the
anchor are connected Setting of the scene is
confusing or distracting Only a few props and visuals |
Most characters are in costume Images behind the anchor are connected to the content
of presentation Image/scenes for reporters make sense Use of props or other
visuals |
All characters are in
costume Images
behind the anchor grab attention and enhance message Use of ÒcutawaysÓ and other visual
devices. Many props and visuals used |
|
Group
work |
Consistently off task Disrespectful to other members ideas or contributions Rarely contributes or assists in the group project Does not follow through with commitments and
responsibilities. |
Often Òoff-taskÓ or
distracting Occasionally provides
group with constructive comments Follows through with most
commitments and responsibilities Presentation repetition or
lacks transitions between members |
Stays on task Makes sure every group member understands task and
progress Treats members of group with respect Follows through with commitments and responsibilities Entire presentation flows well with transitions
between members |
Satisfies all the meeting
criteria +
Pulls group together when they are off task All group members can answer
questions about poster Does extra work: _________________________ |